20070914 PAWS meeting: Ontology-based Annotation
Ontology-based Annotation by Sergey Sosnovsky
provide semantic annotations
knowledge sharing
indexing by human
motivation: using ontology on applications
definition: creating a markup of web documents using a pre-existing ontology and/or populating knowledge bases by marked up documents.
important characters: automation;format; languages; etc.
SMORE by UMaryland:
it does extract data from documents, but it still replies on human to edit and index the concepts.
but there are problems of manual Annotation, eg. time, expensive, storage, trust
solution: search engine like annotation service
O-based Annotation:
supervised: eg. MnM, human user can accept or reject the annotation.
unsupervised: eg. Amilcare;Annie; T-REX; Pankow: use the templates and query them from google, and collect the hits
SemTag(by IBM): it extracts a huge amount of webpages, automatically get a huge amount of disambiguated semantics tags
Conclusion:
it's a necessary thing
manual is bad, automatic is good
Questions/Comments:
-2006 AAAI paper, there's a work, codes&errors, the value of mining the database? what's the relation btw this and the C parser? (C parser is not the annotation, it's the formal structured grammar)
-common sense is certainly more than grammar
-
Adaptation Hypermedia Technology <--------------------> simple key words
(meaningful concepts)
we can consider to use meaningful parsers and other technology mentioned earlier in this talk to bridge these two.
provide semantic annotations
knowledge sharing
indexing by human
motivation: using ontology on applications
definition: creating a markup of web documents using a pre-existing ontology and/or populating knowledge bases by marked up documents.
important characters: automation;format; languages; etc.
SMORE by UMaryland:
it does extract data from documents, but it still replies on human to edit and index the concepts.
but there are problems of manual Annotation, eg. time, expensive, storage, trust
solution: search engine like annotation service
O-based Annotation:
supervised: eg. MnM, human user can accept or reject the annotation.
unsupervised: eg. Amilcare;Annie; T-REX; Pankow: use the templates and query them from google, and collect the hits
SemTag(by IBM): it extracts a huge amount of webpages, automatically get a huge amount of disambiguated semantics tags
Conclusion:
it's a necessary thing
manual is bad, automatic is good
Questions/Comments:
-2006 AAAI paper, there's a work, codes&errors, the value of mining the database? what's the relation btw this and the C parser? (C parser is not the annotation, it's the formal structured grammar)
-common sense is certainly more than grammar
-
Adaptation Hypermedia Technology <--------------------> simple key words
(meaningful concepts)
we can consider to use meaningful parsers and other technology mentioned earlier in this talk to bridge these two.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home